TABLE TALK
A publication of the
Here is an article about Larry Rawls, secretary of the Vermont Bridge Association.
I was a bit of a nomad as a kid attending nine schools in 12
years. First grade was the elementary school associated with
I left the phone company and moved to
As I mentioned earlier, I first learned to play bridge in
prep school in the 1960s. Regrettably, too much bridge in college led to one of
my forced leaves of absence. Afterwards, I didn't play for almost 20 years
until I arrived in
Minor(ity?) Report
by Bryant Jones
Most of us play 5-card majors, so we frequently open 1C/1D with a 3-card suit. As we strive to play contracts in major suits or NT (because of the scoring table), your partner will give little credence to your minor suit--unless you rebid it. So if your holdings in the minors are 3/3, 4/4, 3/4, or 4/3 which do you prefer--1C or 1D? Most texts suggest/dictate that with four of both you open 1D; with 3 of both you start with 1C; and with 3/4 or 4/3 you open the longer suit--regardless of quality. I find this to be short-sighted! For your consideration: Open the minor you prefer to have partner lead.
Entirely too often when I open 1 of a minor, the opponents outbid us in a major. And partner is sometimes on lead. Say, 1D--1S--P--2(or 3)S followed by all pass. With nothing of consequence, more often than not partner will lead "my" suit, even though s/he realizes it could be "suspect." However, if we have agreed that we choose to open the "more desireable" minor, our chances of getting off to the best defense are greatly improved. Ignoring major suit holdings, suppose we have a choice of 1C/1D holding KJx in clubs and Axxx in diamonds. Partner, holding Qxx in both, will lead the suit you have opened. If you chose 1C (2 honors vs 1), you get a club lead. This may(should/could) result in 3 (or 4) minor suit tricks on defense--depending on the location of the diamond K and whether clubs are evenly divided. With a diamond lead we may take the same tricks. After winning the Ace of diamonds, however, I may (or may not) find the club switch--especially if Axx appears in dummy. Additionally, if the jack of diamonds is in declarer's hand and the king in dummy, we may have presented declarer with a trick s/he did not deserve.
Are there drawbacks? Certainly. Holding 4/4 in the majors, there is no choice of which minor to open. Also, there is "nobody's favorite"--the dreaded 1-4-4-4 pattern with a spade singleton. If you open "better minor" and partner bids the expected 1S, you a forced to rebid 1NT with a singleton. Almost as bad is opening 1D and rebidding 2C--partner will certainly expect 9+ cards in the minors. The only "good" news is that all other partnerships holding your cards are faced with the same dilemma. Thus, your "guess"/choice is probably as good as theirs.
Summary/Suggestion: When holding 3(or4) cards in both minors, open the suit you prefer to have led.
Prediction: Over time, your defense figures to improve when the opponents buy the contract.
Note: Partner should not be raising your minor (voluntarily) without 5 (or at the worst 4 "good" ones).
(If you wind up in a 4-3 instead of a 5-4, I'll take the blame! BDJ)
Once again, and, as usual, VBA members have performed well at recent regional and national tournaments. We note the following performances of 20 points + (or within hailing distance)
Mary Savko 40.13 Courtney Nelson 21.20
Ellie Hanlon 40.13
Jonna Robinson 36.93 Paul Cohen 19.97
Don Sondergeld 22.81 Andy Avery 19.97
Sandra Hammer
Mary Tierney 18.80
Sturbridge
Regional
Hank Youngerman 41.52
James Gordon 67.44 Ellie Hanlon 23.82
Mary Savko 23.82
James Gordon 119.80 Don Sondergeld 26.13
Ellie Hanlon 39.05 Jean-Guy Beliveau 18.49
Mary Savko 39.05
Jonna Robinson 29.34 Hank Youngerman 23.14
Phil Sharpsteen 24.34 Mary Savko 21.31
Frank Hacker 24.34 Ellie Hanlon 21.31
Jean Brown
Abe Brown 24.00 Mary Tierney 20.61
Don Sondergeld 25.50 Andy Avery 23.61
All of this information comes from the ACBL web site. Humble apologies to those I may have inadvertently omitted.
Crazy Eights
by Frank Hacker
Some sessions of bridge don’t go very well. The opponents are lucky or your partner is even worse than usual. Hard as it may be to believe, you play somewhat less than perfectly. At times like this, one has to derive small pleasure from the joy of bridge artistry. Consider the following hand from the second session of the Marilyn Hacker Memorial Pairs.
H 874
D A853
C K83
S 10932
H Q962 H 103
D 1074 D QJ2
C 94 C Q762
H AKJ5
D K96
C AJ105
I ask you to note the most important feature of this deal. The North hand has all four 8s.
I was South and became declarer in 3NT on the partnership auction 2NT – 3NT. The opening lead was a somewhat strange 10 of diamonds.
I won the ace in dummy and played a low club to the jack. Now I got the inspiration to try for a trick with my queen of spades. I led a low spade to dummy’s queen and East’s king. East was also inspired. He returned the queen of diamonds. I won the king in hand and continued with the 9 of diamonds to East’s jack. East now returned a spade. I won with the ace and, concluding that West probably had 4 hearts, I cashed the ace and king of hearts and led my low club to dummy’s king. All of this led to the following end position
S 8
H 8
D 8
C 8
S 109 S J6
H Q9 H
D D
C C Q7
S
H J5
D
C AJ
Dummy was a joy to behold. How often does one achieve 4 of a kind? I cashed the 8 of diamonds, throwing a heart and took the club finesse. When I cashed the club ace, West, who was also having a bad day, threw the queen of hearts -- making 5.
Also in the curiosity department is the following hand from
one of the team games at the recent
H xx
D KJxxxx
C Ax
S xxx
H J10x H AKxxx
D xx D Qx
C KJ9xx C xxx
H Qxx
D Axx
C Q10x
The auction proceeded
North East South West
2D P 2S P
3H P 3NT All pass
The redouble was alerted as a reverse Rosenkranz redouble, showing a 2 heart bid with none of the top 3 honors. This made my queen of hearts look good and I felt fairly comfortable bidding 3NT. West led the jack of hearts which East ducked to preserve communications. I now took 6 diamond tricks, 4 spade tricks, 1 club trick, 1 heart trick and a partridge in a pear tree - making 6 for + 690.
Little did I imagine the carnage that took place at my teammates’ table. I don’t know the auction, but North became declarer in 3NT. East led a low heart and declarer decided not to put up dummy’s queen. The defense now took 5 heart tricks before East shifted to a low club. West covered dummy’s 10 with the jack and declarer won the ace. Declarer, for some reason barely fathomable, led a diamond to the ace and took the diamond finesse on the way back. East won the queen and continued clubs. The defense took in total 5 heart tricks, 4 club tricks, 1 diamond trick and, of course, the partridge in the pear tree. Our teammates were + 600 for a gain of 1,290 on what looked like a fairly innocuous hand.
No one I spoke to was able to beat the record of taking 9 tricks more than the other table in the same contract (assuming one ignores minor difference of playing from the opposite side of the table).
Moving Up
New Junior Masters
Thomas
Bentien Karen
Kristiansen Sally
Newton
Linda
Brenner Dorothy
LaBrie Selina Peyser
Fred
Burbank Harold
Leitenberg Gay Squire
Ellie
Dyett Heidi
Luxner Elliott
Turley
June
Felis John
New Club Masters
Kathleen Colman Barbara
Marks Robert
Weiss
New Sectional Masters
John Conova Gloria
Singer
New Regional Masters
Luisa
Chernyshov
New Silver Life Master
Bryant
Jones
As of September 2005
It wasn’t that long ago that 500 master points was enough to make the top 50. Next year the benchmark will probably be 1,000.
1. Ellie Hanlon 9,189 26. Rudolph Polli 1,772
2. Leonard Karp
6,966 27. Robert Smith 1,735
3. Anne Hoffman 6,358 28. Nicholas Ecker Racz 1,598
4. Mary Savko 6,175 29. Lynn Carew 1,587
5. James Gordon 4,386 30. Jonna Robinson 1,544
6. Frank Hacker 3,944 31. Barbara Fitzgerald 1,333
7. Hank Youngerman 2,828 32. Peter Bouyea 1,300
8. Philip Sharpsteen 2,800 33. Gerow Carlson 1,260
9. Michael Farrell 2,726 34. Andy Avery 1,235
10. Gerald DiVincenzo 2,643 35. Patricia Nestork 1,233
11. Fred Donald 2,623 36. Stephen Bean 1,214
12. Michael Engel 2,461 37. Steve Dunham 1,197
13. Kathleen Farrell 2,383 38. Linda Bouyea 1,185
14. Clifford Gordon 2,351 39. Chris Acker 1,165
15. June Dorion 2,322 40.
16. Wayne Hersey 2,133 41. Paul Reardon 1,142
17. Courtney Nelson 2,044 42. Michael Arnowitt 1,119
18. David Shaw 1,982 43. Jean Brown 1,086
19. Donald Sondergeld 1,977 44. Abraham Brown 1,080
20. Patricia DiVincenzo 1,961 45. Bryant Jones 1,039
21. Sandra Hammer 1,906 46. Jean Tout 1,020
22. Edsel Hughes 1,905 47. William Sibley 989
23. Jackie Kimel 1,876 48.
24. Pierce Smith 1,806 49. Louise Acker 940
25. Judith Donald 1,774 50. David Perrin 935
Tiernan Trophy Race
Every year the Vermont Bridge Association presents the
Tiernan trophy to the
1/2 Phil Sharpsteen 32.75 5/6 Chris Acker 23.00
1/2 Frank Hacker 32.75 7 Michael Arnowitt 21.18
3/4 Mary Savko 25.46 8 Jackie Kimel 17.89
3/4 Ellie Hanlon 25.46 9 Gerald DiVincenzo 17.59
5/6 Louise Acker 23.00 10
My apologies for any mistakes. If I have erroneously left you out or miscalculated your total, please let me know.
as of September 2005
We continue the list of
51. Mary Tierney 924 79. Cathy Mleko 646
52. Marcia
Wilkins 908 80. Jesse Stalker 636
53. Ruth Stokes 902 80. David Miller 636
54. Mary Azarian 899 82. Irene Vignoe 618
55. William
Schiring 884 83. Edward Brass 593
56. Gene Kazlow 811 83. Carol Hess 593
56. Jay
Friedenson 811 85. Jean-Guy Beliveau 561
58. Richard Hess 807 86 Patricia Earle 557
60. Rigmor
Shawcross 766 88. Raymond Johnson 512
61. Douglas Clark 745 89. Joyce Stone 482
62. Barbara
Philpet
732
89. Henry Peltz 482
63. Sylvia Smith 725 91. Sarah Bastick 461
64. Paul Cohen 721 92. Robert Chiabrandy 459
65. Eileen
Fleiter 720 92. Alan Wertheimer 459
66. James Thomas 714 94. Pearl McGrath 452
67. C Edward
Midgley 705 95. Joan Casey 443
68. Laura Midgley 703 96. Lois Mailloux 433
69. Jon Stokes 696 97. John Vogeler 427
70. Robert
Silverman 692 98. D. Peters 425
71. Stuart Osborn 691 99. Kotze Toshev 407
72. Mary Granger 689 100. Hazel Stannard 393
73. Gary Feingold 685 100. Thomas Smith 393
74. Jim Daigle 679 102. Nancy Lolli 388
74. Elizabeth
Clewley 679 102. George Malek 388
76. Edward
Schirmer 678 102. Marsha Anstey 388
76. Robert
Edwards 678 105. Jack Casey 386
78. Mitchell
Kontoff 658 105. Richard Gazley 386
Thanks
Thanks and a tip of the hat to Elinor Horne and David Jenkins for providing the entertaining acrostic on the next page. Elinor and David are regulars at the Norwich Bridge Club.
Most of the clues in their acrostic are bridge related. If you have never done an acrostic before, you need to know that the crossword part is a quote and the first letters of clues A through Y give the author and source. If you have difficulty, you can find the quote elsewhere in this issue. From the quote you can work backward to determine all the clues.

July 7 -10, 2005
Friday Afternoon Open Pairs
MPs A B C
5.50 1 Lloyd Arvedon - Kelsey Nickerson 70.60%
4.13 2 1 Irene Vignoe - Patricia Williams 62.50%
3.09 3 Sandra Nelson - William Nelson 62.24%
2.51 4 2 Jonna Robinson - Peter Bouyea 62.04%
1.74 5 Frank Hacker - Philip Sharpsteen 61.34%
1.31 6
1.88 3 John Riopelle - John O'Brien 59.49%
2.06 4 1 Ronald Silverman - June Silverman 55.79%
1.55 5 2 Bertrand Nadeau - Carlos Galvan 55.47%
1.16 6 3 Jennifer Stern - Robert Stern 53.38%
0.87 4 Patricia Pember - Betty Faulkner 49.07%
0.65 5 Eleanor Eisenman - Mildred Hill 48.38%
Fri Eve Open Pairs
MPs A B C
5.50 1 Lynn Carew - Patricia Nestork 69.84%
4.13 2 Jackie Kimel - David Shaw 62.96%
3.09 3 Shome Mukherjee - William Hunter 59.68%
2.32 4 Joan Alepin - Benjamin Dray 59.49%
1.74 5 Peter Bouyea - Jonna Robinson 59.28%
1.31 6 Michael Farrell - Gerald Di Vincenzo 59.26%
2.81 1 1 Bonnie Clouser - Paul Clouser 57.18%
2.11
2 2
1.58 3 Louise Acker - Chris Acker, 52.78%
1.19 4 Paul Reardon - Jacqueline Reardon 50.93%
0.89 5 Jean Brown - Abraham Brown 49.07%
1.13 6 3 Bertrand Nadeau - Carlos Galvan 48.61%
0.94 4 Mae Beck - Claus Buchthal 45.96%
0.82
5
Fri Eve 0-299er Pairs
MPs Rank
1.31 1 Roger Cooley - Anne Cooley 67.00%
0.98 2 Eleanor Eisenman - Mildred Hill 56.00%
Sat Aft Open Pairs
MPs A B C
6.50 1 Mary Savko – Ellie Hanlon 64.74%
4.88 2 Joan Alepin - Benjamin Dray 64.42%
3.75 3 1 Myron Siegel - Judith Siegel 63.30%
2.74 4 Shome Mukherjee - William Hunter 62.50%
2.81 5 2 Morris Cramer - Ross Lounsbury 62.34%
1.54 6 Judy Dubay - William Dubay 61.86%
2.27 3 1 Bonnie Clouser - Pat Hoffmann 56.57%
1.58 4 Louise Acker - Chris Acker 54.49%
1.27 5/6 C Edward Midgley - Laura Midgley 54.01%
1.04 5/6 Peter Lombardo - Grace Lombardo 54.01%
1.70 2 June Silverman - Ronald Silverman 53.85%
1.28 3 Patricia Pember - Betty Faulkner 50.48%
0.96 4 Rose Gove - Edward Gove 50.32%
0.72 5 Penny Weill - Jeffrey Weill 49.52%
0.61 6 Bertrand Nadeau - Carlos Galvan 47.60%
Sat Aft 0-299 Pairs
MPs Rank
1.31 1 Patricia Pember – Betty Faulkner 50.48%
0.98 2 Penny Weill - Jeffrey Weill,
Sat Eve Flight A Pairs
MPs Rank
6.00 1 Mary Savko - Ellie Hanlon 60.19%
3.94 2/3 Stewart Mackeigan - Pierce Smith 57.31%
3.94 2/3 Robert Donald - Diane Burger 57.31%
2.53 4 William Hunter - Shome Mukherjee 56.92%
1.90 5 Sandra Nelson - William Nelson 54.62%
1.42 6 Betty Bloom - Steve Bloom 54.23%
Sat Flight B/C/D Pairs
MPs B C D
3.35 1 Paul Reardon - Linda Bouyea, 63.94%
2.51 2 Chris Acker - Louise Acker 60.42%
1.95 3 1 1 Sheila Barton - Renee Sahyoun 59.62%
1.46 4 2 2 Kathleen Berger - Richard Berger 57.85%
1.10 5 3 3 Vivienne Adair - Mark Adair 55.61%
0.80 6 Peter Lombardo - Grace Lombardo 55.13%
0.82 4 Donald Wallace - Polly Schoning 53.85%
0.62 5 4 Bertrand Nadeau - Carlos Galvan 52.72%
Sunday Swiss Teams
MPs A B C
7.25 1 Babette Rogers - Michael Rogers
Betty Bloom - Steve Bloom
Lloyd Arvedon - Kelsey Nickerson 119.00
5.44 2 Andy Avery - Paul Cohen
Ellie Hanlon - Mary Savko 105.00
4.08 3 John Cook - Joan Cook
Maurice Emond - Anna Carlson 99.00
3.06 4 William Dubay - Judy Dubay
Andrew Dubay - Harry Kaufmann 97.00
2.29 5 David Shaw - Jackie Kimel
Laura Midgley - C Edward Midgley 96.00
1.72 6 Jonna Robinson - Peter Bouyea
Linda Bouyea - Paul Reardon 92.00
3.41 1 1 Karen Kristiansen - Sheila Long
Rosemarie Belisle - Jeannie Clermont 76.00
2.56 2 Bonnie Clouser - Paul Clouser
Martha Gazley - Richard Gazley 74.00
1.92
3
Raymond Johnson - George Stannard III 73.00
Scott Aborn Trophy Race
Starting with 2005, the Vermont Bridge Association will
present the Scott Aborn trophy to the
1 Bonnie Clouser 14.96 6/7 June Silverman 6.10
2
3 Alan Wertheimer 8.60 8/9 Carlos Galvan 5.72
4 Rhoda Chickering 8.21 8/9 Bertrand Nadeau 5.72
5 Paul Clouser 6.15 10 Sandy Desilets 5.71
My apologies for any mistakes. If I have erroneously left you out or miscalculated your total, please let me know.
Reiter Teams
The annual Reiter Memorial Teams took place on September 10
at the
The first annual
Here are the overall winners
Morning Session
MPs A B C
2.69 1 Judy Siegel – Myron Siegel 65.77%
2.02 2 June Dorion – Wayne Hersey 60.20%
1.51 3 Jean Seward – Jesse Stalker 60.12%
1.60 4 1 Mary Louise Thorndike – Ri Shawcross 56.46%
.85 5 Dave Shaw –
1.20 2 Agnes Kurtz – Tom Kurtz 53.74%
.90 3 Polly Schoning – Sally Holt 50.34%
.68 4
1.05 1 Connie Fitzcharles – Peggy Connolly 48.51%
.79 2 Carol Miller – Paul Miller 47.92%
Afternoon Session
MPs A B C
2.69 1 Dave Shaw –
2.02 2 1 1 Ann Bottelli – Dick Bottelli 61.31%
1.51 3 June Dorion – Wayne Hersey 59.26%
1.13 4 Jean Seward – Jesse Stalker 57.14%
1.05 5/6 2/3 2/3 Connie Fitzcharles – Peggy Connolly 54.47%
1.05 5/6 2/3 2/3 Carol Miller – Paul Miller 54.47%
.70 4 Maria Glassberg – Claire Gardner 54.23%
Marilyn Hacker Memorial Pairs
The sixth annual Marilyn Hacker Memorial Pairs took place on
August 6 at the
MPs A B C
3.83 1 Mary Savko – Ellie Hanlon 229.00
2.87 2 Gerald DiVincenzo – Philip Sharpsteen 206.00
2.69 3 1 Abe Brown – Jean Brown 202.50
1.62 4 Patricia DiVincenzo – Kathy Farrell 193.50
1.21 5 Judith Donald – Fred Donald 185.50
2.02 2 Mary Azarian - Gerow Carlson 180.00
1.51 3 Stephen Bean – Jay Friedenson 178.00
1.13 4 Barbara Nadler –
Extra Chance
Here is an old chestnut. You arrive at a contract of 7NT on the following layout. The opening lead is the jack of spades. How do you play the hand?
H KQJ
D 2
C J987642
S K
H A
D AKQ76543
C AKQ
Clearly you have a zillion tricks, if diamonds split 3-1 or better, but what if they don’t? The spade lead gives you entry problems. You should not neglect the small additional chance of a singleton 10 of clubs. You should win the ace of spades and follow with the queen of spades on which you discard the ace of hearts. You can then take the KQJ of hearts, discarding your AKQ of clubs. What fun it is to discard all of these honors! Finally play the jack of clubs. If the club 10 drops, you can make the contract on the strength of your club tricks, even if diamonds break 4-0. There is no excuse for being careless.
Acrostic Answer
Everybody criticizes his partner. It’s natural, but it’s not so smart. Take any other sport. Can you imagine a tennis player turning to his partner who misses a shot and bawling him out? It’s absurd of course. Then why is it acceptable practice in duplicate bridge.
Mike Farrell of the
The Rule of 20
Valuation for Opening the Bidding
by Mike Farrell
Since the 1940’s, when
Charles Goren published and popularized the 4-3-2-1 Point Count Method, bridge
players in
The Rule of 20 is a simple
method for evaluating a hand for opening values. Simply stated the rule says: In 1st
or 2nd Seat (the rule is not applicable in 3rd and 4th
seats), one counts the High Card Points (HCP) and then adds in the length of
the two longest suits in the hand. If
the total of HCP plus cards in the 2 longest suits equals 20 or more, open the
hand.
EX: S: AJxxx
H: KQxxx D: xx C: x
HCP: A = 4 + K = 3 + Q = 2 +
J = 1 = 10
2 Longest Suits: Spades 5 + Hearts 5 =
10
We should open the hand 1
Spade 20
Change the Heart & Club
holdings to H: KQxx and C: xx and we would pass (the 2 long suits now
have but 9 cards.)
But make the hand
pattern: S: AJxxxx
H: KQxx D: xx C: x
And we are back to 20 and may
open.
WHY USE THE RULE OF 20?
Point count bidding alone
does not accurately evaluate a hand with distributional values. We can always add a point for each extra card
above 4 in a suit. Often that method alone
allows us to open some marginal hands that we might not under a strict
adherence to Point Count Method, and it is good strategy to open distributional
hands. It is important to open the
bidding whenever the hand strength or distribution dictates, because in today’s
duplicate climate the bidding style is becoming more and more aggressive….not
necessarily in the level of the bid but in the lightning quick and early
strikes your opponents make.
It is much safer to OPEN the
bidding with a lighter, distributional hand, than to pass and overcall later. First, it is far more difficult to double an
opening bid for penalties than to double an overcall. Second, if you wait to overcall, especially
with a two-suited hand, you may not get the chance to show both suits. Being able to bid both suits is important if
partner has a fit only for your second suit.
The Rule of 20 helps you decide which marginal hands are suitable for
opening.
EX: S: 6 H: AJ983 D: K73 C: QJT6
If you don’t open this hand
One Heart in 1st or 2nd seat, you can expect the auction
to go something like 1 Spade – 2 Spades, back to you. If you open One Heart and left hand opponent
overcalls One Spade, your partner with some values may be able to raise hearts,
or make a negative double or pass. In
any event you are far better placed when right hand opponent raises spades to
the two-level. Even if you pass, you have managed to put in a lead-directing
bid.
The next hand exchanges the
Spade and Heart suits from the hand above:
EX: S: AJ983 H: 6 D: K73 C: QJT6
Can you see the advantages of
opening this hand One Spade?
1: You have preempted the
entire one-level. Any suit bid by LHO
(Left Hand Opponent) must be at the two-level.
This alone may keep some opponents from even entering the auction.
2: Even when LHO bids 2
Hearts, if partner can raise your spades, it may preclude LHO’s partner from
raising hearts (at the 3 level??)
By taking “Light Initial
Action” (opening marginal but worthy hands) you will get to play more hands,
and everybody wants to play more hands!
Marty
LET’S USE, NOT LOSE, OUR HEADS!!!
There is obviously more to
evaluating a hand than simply adding up a couple of numbers. Arguably most, if not all, Rule of 20 hands
are marginal openers. Advanced players like to combine parts of other
“principles” as check backs on marginal hands.
These “principles” are:
(A) In and Out Valuation: Honor cards in
your long suits are more valuable than honor cards in short suits. Since we are discussing when to open the
bidding, we will at this time consider only our long suit(s). (After partner
bids, we can reevaluate our honor values based on which suit partner bids.)
(B) Honor Texture: honors supporting
other honors in a suit are
more powerful than if they are
scattered.
(C) Intermediate Texture: 10’s, 9’s 8’s and 7’s are much
more
powerful than lesser spot cards.
Adjustments (+ and -). The 4-3-2-1 honor count has a real
flaw. It clearly undervalues Aces and
forgets Tens (which it awards no value), while overvaluing
For each Ace that does not have an offsetting
Queen (a Queen anywhere in the hand) +
For every Ten in a long suit +
For good intermediates in a long suit +
For every Queen that does not have an
offsetting Ace (An Ace anywhere in the hand.)
-
For every soft card (Queen or Jack) in a
short suit -
After counting the HCP and
adding in the 2 long suits, count and add the pluses and minuses. For every 2 extra pluses add one point to the Rule of 20 count. For
every 2 extra minuses, subtract a point
from the Rule of 20 Count.
Consider the following two
hands, each with 10 points in high cards.
1. S: AQT98 H: AT98 D: void C: T987
2. S: Q H:
QJ D: Q5432 C: QJ432
Hand 1 counts up to 22 –
10HCP + 9 for the length of the 2 longest suits
+ 3 for 6 pluses
2 Aces versus 1 Queen = 1+
2 Tens in your two long suits = 2+
3 suits with good intermediates =
3+
Hand 2 counts up to 17 – 10HCP
+ 10 for the length of the 2 longest suits
-3 for 7 minuses
4
3 soft honors (Q of S and the QJ
of H) in short suits = 3-
Following the rule, one would
open the first hand, but not even think about opening the second.
It is apparent that there are
20-point hands, 20-Point Hands and 20-POINT HANDS. Now that you have the tools to help quantify
that which before you might have only felt viscerally, you are in possession of
a Better Method of hand evaluation.
COMING EVENTS
October 26-28 --- Vermont Fall Sectional (see flyer)
November 9-13 --- District 25 regional --- Sheraton Hotel,
November 17-27 --- ACBL fall national tournament --- Adams Mark Hotel, Denver, CO
December 3 --- Unit Game – Perrin Pairs -
Thank You
Table Talk would like to thank its many patrons. If you would like to be a patron, please send a check for $10 made out to Unit 175 to Ronald Plante
List of Patrons
Chris and Louise Acker Anne Hoffman
Andy Avery Pat Hoffmann
Linda Baker Sally Holt
Liz Bean Norma Jackominich
Steve Bean Dave Jarmy
Bill Becker Bryant Jones
Abe and Jean Brown Jackie Kimel
Jean-Guy and Connie Beliveau Carol Maeder
Don Campbell Courtney Nelson
Rhoda Chickering Ron Plante
Bonnie Clouser Jonna Robinson
Paul Clouser Babette and Michael Rogers
Paul Cohen Mary Savko
Katherine Coppock Jean Seward
Rich DeMartino Dave Shaw
Sandy Desilets Ernie Shawcross
June Dorion June and Ron Silverman
Kathy Farrell Gloria Singer
Michael Farrell Allan Snow
Barbara Fitz-Gerald Lucy and Gary Spongberg
Michael and
Jay Friedenson Kate Stewart
Ernest Gibson Jim Thomas
Roy Green Mary Tierney
Eunice Grover Barbara Unger
Frank Hacker Richard Unger
Ellie Hanlon Judi Ward
Sanction S0510049
October 28, 29, 30, 2005
Cortina Inn and
Resort,
Schedule of Events
Friday Oct. 28
KO Teams – 1st
session
Saturday Oct. 29
KO Teams – 2nd
session
7 PM Open Pairs, Stratiflighted------Flight A is separate
event
------Flight B,C,D is separate stratified
event
KO Teams – final session
Sunday Oct. 30
10:30 AM 1st session of stratified
open Swiss Teams
0 to 300 Swiss Teams
Open Stratifications: A: 1,500+
B: 500-1,500 C: < 500
Newcomer Stratifications: A: <100 B: <50
C: <20
Saturday Evening: B:
500-1,500 C:
200-500 D: 0-200
Strats may be adjusted by director based on attendance
Price per session: $8 ($11 Canadian), $1 additional for Non-ACBL
members
Director: Dave Marshall
Partnerships and
Information: Jackie Kimel (802) 864-4321
Accommodations at Cortina
Inn: 1
person 2 persons
Superior
Room $149 $189
Queen
Deluxe $159 $199
King
Deluxe $169 $209
Package includes 2 night stay
with 2 breakfast buffets and a $10 food voucher per person towards dinner in
Zola’s Grille.