TABLE TALK
A publication of the
Vermont Bridge Association June
2006
. Editor: Frank Hacker
email:frhac@charter.net
Sally and John Newton of
If you play against them, watch out!!!
Here, in their own words, is the story of Sally and John Newton.
There are probably some reading this who remember Culbertson
and two and a half points required to open the bidding!! That’s how bridge
started for Sally Haire Newton in the 1940s in
Also started Abe and Jean Brown on there bridge Odyssey.
There was bridge on the fringe in college in
Good times often change! Ronald became ill and bridge ceased.
In 1990, Sally and son John came to
Then a small miracle occurred. John started playing bridge
on the internet. All those summer vacations under his grandfather’s tutelage
paid off. One day in 2004, he suggested playing in a real game with live
people. They went to a St. Albans duplicate game and eventually to
They joined the ACBL in June 2005 and travel to duplicate
games whenever their busy lives permit. Sally does volunteer work for her
garden club, the local historical society and her church. John is a
para-educator at
Times
We all know that the game we love has lost some of its
popularity with the general population and that the bridge playing population
is aging. From time to time newspapers discontinue their bridge column,
something unthinkable not too long ago.
The Times Argus – the Montpelier/Barre newspaper did just that at the end of May. I am happy to report that the bridge column returned after just a one week hiatus.
Many devotees of the game called to complain and to
encourage reinstatement. Frank Hacker actually spoke to the editor who made the
decision. She said she was surprised by the response. The bridge column has
survived, at least for the time being.
ON THE WAY UP
Congratulations to the following Vermonters who have reached higher ranks in the ACBL masterpoint hierarchy
Junior Master: John Bennett Margaret Fariss
Lucille Leary Marc Monheimer
Club Master: Mark Adair Donald Bly
Betty Faulkner Kay Fay
Michael Furlong Nancy Furlong
Ping Gee Karen Kristiansen
Patricia Merrill
Sectional Master: Richard Ross
Regional Master: Kathleen Berger Bertrand Nadeau
Life Master: Jon Stokes Alan Wertheimer
Bronze Life Master: Jon Stokes (achieved 2 new ranks at the same time)
Gold Life Master: Kathleen Farrell
Tiernan Trophy Race
Every year the Vermont Bridge Association awards the Tiernan trophy to the VBA player who wins the most master points in the 4 Vermont Sectional tournaments. Here are the top 10 after 2 tournaments. My apologies to anyone I may have inadvertently omitted.
Please inform the editor about errors or omissions.
1. Jerry DiVincenzo 22.96 7. Mike Farrell 17.13
2/3. Sally Newton 21.08 8/9. Lynn Carew 15.67
2/3. John Newton 21.08 8/9. Pat Nestork 15.67
4. Kathy Farrell 19.26 10/11. June Dorion 15.29
5/6. Phil Sharpsteen 18.15 10/11. Wayne Hersey 15.29
5/6. Frank Hacker 18.15
Scott Aborn Trophy Race
Every year the Vermont Bridge Association awards the Tiernan trophy to the VBA player who begins the year as a non-life master and wins the most master points in the 4 Vermont Sectional tournaments. Here is a list of those who have accumulated more than 5 points after 2 tournaments. My apologies to anyone I may have inadvertently omitted.
Please inform the editor about errors or omissions.
1/2. Sally Newton 21.08 4/5. Rhoda Chickering 7.75
1/2. John Newton 21.08 6/7. Sheila Long 5.73
3. C. Kirk Osterland 7.88 6/7. Karen Kristiansen 5.73
4/5. Sandy Desilets 7.75 8. John Conova 5.56
9. Tom Osmer 5.35
MY FIRST BRIDGE TOURNAMENT
by Dave Shaw
It was 1967. I was stationed at Davis-Monthan AFB in
Even though I had a great
partner, I was very nervous. And it took
half the first session before I relaxed.
But, after that, it was clear sailing.
We didn’t win anything, but my first tournament was behind me.
I wanted to share that experience
with our 100 or so newer players and an additional 200 or so players with fewer
than 299 points, each of whom is eligible for the Intermediate/Novice programs
that will run continuously at the Regional Tournament to be held at the
Burlington Sheraton November 8th to 12th. This can be your first tournament experience
and, while I know you’ll be nervous, the I/N environment is so nurturing, I
know you’ll get through it with relative ease.
So, please mark your calendars so
as to take advantage of the Intermediate/Novice opportunity. For more information, please contact Mike
Farrell or Phil Sharpsteen.
MORE IS BETTER!
by Phil Sharpsteen, VBA President
This article is addressed to the
What I am asking each of you to consider is making a small effort to improve attendance at your club. Let me list a few ideas to get the process started. I would love to hear in a future issue of Table Talk of some success stories from our local clubs!
1) One game per month, ask a friend or inactive member to play with you (you can ask that your regular partner that night do the same). Arrive early to acquaint the friend with the bidding box and convention card to help make their experience more enjoyable.
2) Help the club organize a non-member night when all players bring a non-member to the game. The non-members could play for free or get a chit for a 2nd game at the club to encourage them to return. Have interesting refreshments, use nametags and advertise in your local weekly newspaper.
3) Run a hi/low swiss game when you have a 5th game in a month (players won’t have regular partners booked for the 4 times this occurs each year).
4) Invite rubber bridge players to come and play rubber bridge on game night for your normal card fee. Have someone available to answer their questions as they play – sort of a free teacher!
Above all, make sure you greet newcomers to your club and make them feel at home. A good guideline: treat them as if you had invited them to your home for a bridge party. You can even have an announced rule (in fun!) after introductions:
‘Don’t double the first time guests!’
20th WORLDWIDE BRIDGE CONTEST
The 20th worldwide bridge contest took place as
two single session events on Friday, June 2 and Saturday, June 3. Each event
had thousands of competitors around the world, all competing within a time
period of approximately 36 hours. The early standings consisted primarily of results
from
Competition was essentially local and master points were
awarded on the basis of the local results. All competitors also received
international rankings based on results match pointed across the entire
international field. The order of listing in the results below is based on the
local rankings, but as you will readily see, the international rankings don’t
follow the local rankings. In particular, North-South competitors in
The international rankings listed below are based on 5,302 pairs on Friday and 4,711 pairs on Saturday
Friday Results
Local Rank Name Int’l Rank Int’l
Points
1 Judie - Fred Donald 118 108,553
2 Pat Nestork – Lynn Carew 242 104,722
3 Bryant Jones – Pat Hoffmann 1,703 90,051
4 Mike Farrell – Jerry DiVincenzo 1,604 90,642
5 Tom Smith – Frank Hacker 1,205 93,598
6 Ellie Hanlon – Mary Savko 1,467 91,595
7 Guy Smythe – Al Ceppetelli 1,224 93,440
8 Kathy Farrell – Patty DiVincenzo 2,034 88,086
Saturday Results
Local Rank Name Int’l Rank Int’l
Points
1 Mike Farrell – Jerry DiVincenzo 13 101,035
2 Sally Newton – John Newton 799 83,294
3 Phil Sharpsteen – Frank Hacker 288 89,207
4 Patty DiVincenzo – Kathy Farrell 1,960 75,322
5 Constance & Jean-Guy Beliveau 1,649 77,092
6 Judie Donald – Fred Donald 2,583 71,755
7 Mary Savko – Ellie Hanlon 2,627 71,543
8 Ed Schirmer – Frank Reed 952 81,974
20th WORLDWIDE BRIDGE CONTEST
An Interesting Hand
Board 10 of the Friday competition offered East-West an opportunity for a big score, but only if they had the guts to go for the gusto.
(both vul – dealer East)
North
932
J1072
Q94
KQJ86 A54
4 A95
AKJ1082 73
2 South J9753
107
KQ863
65
Q864
The Auction was East South West North
Pass Pass 1 S Pass
2 S Pass 3 D Pass
4 S Pass 4 NT Pass
5 H Pass 6 S All Pass
This hand has many crossroads, or decision points, starting
with which suit to open. West, the hero on this hand, was Tom Smith, who played
the hand in
The play also required a little bit of care. Tom lost the first club trick and trumped the second club in hand. Tom then cashed the AK of diamonds and ruffed a third diamond in dummy with the spade ace. This set up diamonds and all that remained was to draw trumps and claim. The bidding was aggressive and the final contract required splits in both spades and diamonds. There was a great deal of risk involved, but the reward was great – 7.5 matchpoints out of 8 at the local level and 4561 match points out of 4738 in the international scoring.
HAVE YOU DISCUSSED?
by Phil Sharpsteen
Have you and your favorite partner(s) discussed the meaning of every possible bid in every auction? (e.g. partner opens a 15-17 1NT – assign a meaning to every bid from 2C to 7NT?! I certainly hope you haven’t – you may have the recall memory but you don’t have enough time!
It does pay dividends in good results, however, to agree on methods in auctions that occur fairly frequently. It is most satisfying to have the bidding agreements needed to achieve a good result. In this article I want to discuss a fairly common situation.
Your partner opens 1NT and you begin with a Jacoby transfer of 2D or 2H or a Stayman bid of 2C, which is doubled by your left hand opponent. This type of double has a fairly high frequency, because you are bidding a suit you usually don’t have (a conventional call). It is quite likely your opponent has a suit good enough to double at the 2 level. This double is to indicate a lead to partner who will almost always end up on lead in these types of auctions.
Let’s start with a specific auction: 1NT / pass / 2D / double. The double has changed the requirement to accept the transfer. The opening bidder should pass with only 2 hearts and bid 2 hearts with at least 3-card support. If you are accustomed to super accept (that is jump to 3 hearts) with 4 hearts, you may still do this (the double has not used up any bidding room and you may ignore it). Don’t be afraid to pass with only 2 hearts – with a holding of 6+ hearts, partner can always retransfer by bidding 3D! One other treatment I like after the double is for either partner to redouble holding 5 cards in the doubled suit (in this case diamonds). Partner of the redoubler can then decide whether to play 2D redoubled, retransfer or accept the transfer to play in hearts or to bid to the appropriate NT level. An interesting hand from a recent regional illustrates this treatment in action!
(nobody vul)
Partner (Dealer)
Q652
A4
Q75
AKQ7
J83 K1097
95 Q873
AK106 9
J1086 9543
A4
KJ1062
J8432
2
The auction proceeded: 1NT pass 2D (transfer) Double (shows diamonds)
Pass (2 hearts only) pass (help!) redouble (5 diamonds) pass
Pass (we have 8 diamonds?!!) pass
The final pass is more or less obligatory. East-West may not be too happy, but they have no place to go (any EW contract will be doubled for a large minus). They may as well hope for the best against 2 diamonds.
We got a top board for 2D redoubled (+960!), since 10 tricks are fairly routine on any line of play. Without the double, the probable auction would be: 1NT pass 2D pass 2H pass 3D pass 3NT all pass. Without a spade lead there would be a battle over the ninth trick. If we had bid to 3NT after the double, a diamond lead followed by a shift to the spade J (attacking dummy’s side entry) would have defeated 3NT with 2 diamonds, 1 heart and 2 or 3 spades, depending how well player holding K1097 manages proper unblocking. Moral of the story – if you don’t have the tools to punish aggressive lead directing doubles, the opponents are gaining more often than they are entitled to!
The same treatment can be used after a double of a 2C Stayman call. The opening NT bidder should still bid the appropriate major as requested (ignore the double – don’t allow the opponents to mess up your constructive auctions!) However, it is no longer required to bid 2D with no 4 or 5 card major. You could agree to play the following:
2D: no 4/5 card major but 5 diamonds
pass: no 4/5 card major – implies 4 clubs most of the time
(a 3-3-4-3 pattern would be the only exception)
redouble: no 4/5 card major and 5 clubs!
As you can see, an opponents double gives you a way to convey useful information to partner – IF you have discussed!
THREE CHEERS FOR EDSEL
Edsel Hughes of
(East-West vul – dealer South)
North
984
K6
K764
Q532 6
QJ10732 A9854
8 QJ109
94 South 1062
AKJ107
void
A532
AKJ5
The bidding: South West North East
1 S Pass 1 NT Pass
3 C Pass 3 S Pass
4 D Pass 4 S All Pass
Nowadays, East-West would probably be in the bidding, but life was different back in 1962.
West led the queen of hearts which declarer ruffed in hand. Declarer cashed the ace of spades and crossed to dummy with the king of diamonds. Declarer led a spade from dummy, intending to finesse for the spade queen. East discarded a heart and, to quote Sheinwold, “South started to perspire.” He finally played the 10 of spades and West won the queen.
West led another heart to the king and ace. South saw that, if he ruffed, he would have fewer trumps than West. South discarded a diamond to keep control of the hand.
East, now on lead, led a diamond and West ruffed declarer’s ace. That was declarer’s third loser and he still had a diamond to lose – down 1.
OK, kemo sabes, what is the solution? Could South have avoided this mess? Edsel provided the solution, acknowledged by Sheinwold in his 1962 column. Declarer can keep control by letting the defense hold the first two heart tricks. If the defense leads yet a third heart, declarer can ruff with one of dummy’s trumps. If declarer discards two diamonds at tricks one and two, he can keep control, give up one trump trick and take the rest.
HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED
Note: All information given below is readily available on the ACBL web site (acbl.org)
1. How many members does the ACBL have? (about 156,000)
2. Who has the most masterpoints? (Paul Soloway of WA has 63,246 as of May 6)
(He is followed by Mike Passell of NV with 56,362 and Jeff Meckstroth of FL with 53,963)
3. How many players have more than 10,000 points? (359)
4. How many points does it take to make the ACBL top 100? (16,103)
(By the way #100 is Shome Mukherjee of MA – he attended our recent Killington Sectional)
5. Who is the
top player in
(He also attended our recent Killington Sectional)
6. Who leads the
7. Where do you stand in the ACBL master point hierarchy? The following info should help
Number
of Points Players with
More
100 91,220
200 77,589
500 46,060
1,000 23,035
2,000 8,185
3,000 4,028
4,000 2,395
5,000 1,534
10,000 359
As you can see, about 200 points would put you just about at the ACBL median.
8. How many master points does the ACBL
give out at a typical tournament? (This, of course, depends on the tournament.
The info below should be of interest.
Tournament Points Awarded Number of Point Winners
2006
2006 Killington Sectional 621 163
2006 Cromwell Regional 6,252 897
2006 Hilton Head Regional 22,894 1,523
2006 Gatlinburg Regional 72,502 3,819
2006
9. How many ACBL members won 300 or more master points in 2005? (believe it or not, 1215)
There have been two VBA sectional tournaments since the last Table Talk issue. Here are the results of those tournaments.
SUGAR TIME SECTIONAL
April 7 – 9, 2006
Friday Afternoon Open Pairs
MPs A
B C Score
3.67 1
1 1 John
2.87 2
2
2.06 3 June
Dorion – Wayne Hersey 61.65%
1.55 4
3 Jay Friedenson –
1.28 5 David
Shaw – Jackie Kimel 58.38%
.92
6 Gerald
DiVincenzo – Michael Farrell 56.81%
1.14 4 Thomas Osmer – Bryant Jones 52.04%
.80 5 Julianna
McAllister – George Cantin 51.27%
1.22 2 Thomas
Cronin –
.91 3 William Cloutier – Richard Ross 48.03%
.68 4 Barbara Romanoff – Margie Berger 45.88%
Friday Evening Open Pairs
MPs A
B C Score
3.83 1 Gerald
DiVincenzo – Michael Farrell 67.42%
2.87 2 Lynn
Carew – Pat Nestork 66.48%
2.15 3 David
Shaw – Jackie Kimel 59.85%
2.68 4
1 1 John
1.21 5 Phil
Sharpsteen – Frank Hacker 58.52%
.91 6 June
Dorion – Wayne Hersey 57.01%
2.01 2 2 Gloria Singer – Renee Sahyoun 54.73%
1.51 3 3 Thomas Cronin –
1.13 4 Gerow Carlson – Mary Azarian 51.70%
.85 5
4 Barbara
MacDonald – Betty Stanley 51.33%
.68 5 William Beadle – Patricia Merrill 51.14%
Saturday Afternoon Open Pairs
MPs A
B C Score
4.33 1 Phil
Sharpsteen – Frank Hacker 63.62%
3.25 2
1 1 Suzanne Perreault – Robert Guerard 62.50%
2.44 3
2 Kotze Toshev – Gary Feingold 60.74%
1.83 4
3 2 Mary Ellen McMahon – Catherine Earle 60.58%
1.37 5
4 Bryant Jones –
Thomas Osmer 58.81%
1.09 6 Babette
Rogers – Michael Rogers 58.65%
.97 5 Mary
Azarian – Gerow Carlson 56.25%
.76 6 Jay
Friedenson –
1.16 3 C
Kirk Osterland – John Conova 51.92%
.87 4 William
Cloutier – Richard Ross 51.28%
.65 5 John
Saturday Evening Open Pairs
MPs A
B C Score
4.00 1
1 1 John
3.00 2 Patricia
DiVincenzo – Kathleen Farrell 63.75%
2.25 3
2 Constance Beliveau
– Jean-Guy Beliveau 61.92%
1.69 4
3 Paul Reardon – Jacqueline Reardon 58.21%
2.00 5 Gerald DiVincenzo – Michael
Farrell 56.61%
1.09 6
1.38 4 2 John
Canova – C Kirk Osterland 53.40%
1.34 5 Gerow Carlson – Mary Azarian 53.06%
.94 6 Thomas
Osmer – Bryant Jones 52.96%
1.04 3 Zander
Ponzo – Hans Himelein 52.26%
.87 4 William
Cloutier – Richard Ross 50.92%
.61 5 Julianna McAllister – Helen Lewis 50.58%
Sunday Swiss Teams
MPs A
B C Score
6.25 1 Patricia
DiVincenzo – Gerald DiVincenzo
Michael Farrell – Kathleen
Farrell 90
4.69 2
1 Jay Friedenson –
Gary Feingold
3.52 3 Frank
Hacker – Rudolph Polli
Phil Sharpsteen – Edsel Hughes 84
2.64 4 Paul
Reardon – Mary Tierney
Lynn Carew – Patricia Nestork 83
1.98 5 Jesse
Stalker – Carlos Galvan
Carol Kitchel – Marcia Wilkins 71
3.02 2 Bryant Jones – Barbara Fitzgerald
C Kirk Osterland – John Conova 67
2.26 3 Mark Adair – Vivienne Adair
Pearl McGrath – Theresa Ingram 60
2.44 4/5 1 William
Beadle – Patricia Merrill
Karen Kristiansen – Sheila Long 55
1.49 4/5 Jean-Guy Beliveau – Constance
Beliveau
Elizabeth Clewley – D. Sharpe
55
1.83 2 Sally
Arthur Aiken – Lind Aiken 43
VERMONT
SPRING SECTIONAL
KILLINGTON
May 19 – 21, 2006
Friday Afternoon Open Pairs
MPs A
B C Score
5.83 1 Pat
Nestork – Lynn Carew 64.58%
4.37 2 June
Dorion – Wayne Hersey 63.66%
3.28 3 Thomas
2.46 4 Phil
Sharpsteen – Frank Hacker 59.03%
2.00 5 Jackie
Kimel – David Shaw 57.05%
3.75 6
1 Beverly Balch –
Mary Anne Pickett 56.41%
2.81 2 1 Barbara
Parks –
2.11 3
2 Rhoda Chickering – Sandy
Desilets 55.93%
1.39 4/5 3 Sally
1.39 4/5 Arlene Duboff – Linda Tedeschi 54.40%
.85 6/8 Lois
Tuohey – Linda Tedeschi 54.33%
.88 6/8
4/5 Thomas Cronin –
.94 6/8
4/5 Lawrence Rawls –
Elizabeth von Riesenfelder 54.33%
.75 6/7 Penelope Daly – Joan Brown 53.24%
.75 6/7 Lois Grant –
Friday Evening Open Pairs
MPs A
B C Score
5.83 1 Kathleen
Farrell – Gerald DiVincenzo 66.36%
4.37 2
3.28 3 Joyce
Pearson – Bob Gorsey 62.27%
2.46 4 Lynn
Carew – Pat Nestork 60.59%
1.84 5 Donald
Foote – Judy Maravolo-Foote 59.95%
1.75 6 Judy
Dubay – Harry Kaufmann 58.49%
3.08 1 Linda Bouyea – Paul Reardon 55.19%
2.31 2 Constance Beliveau – Jean-Guy
Beliveau 53.73%
1.73 3 Arlene Duboff – Linda Tedeschi 53.70%
1.73 4 1 Sally
.97 5 Ruth
Anderson – Mary Frederick 53.01%
.73 6 Jesse
Chikalla – Irene Fleming 52.31%
1.30 2 Thomas Cronin –
.97 3 Sandy Desilets – Rhoda Chickering 50.69%
.73 4 Judith Ward – Linda Baker 50.19%
Friday Evening 299er Pairs
MPs Score
1.24 1/2 Jennifer
Feltes – Karen Haines 57.64%
1.24 1/2 Deborah
Crisfield – Jane Grewcock 57.64%
.69
3/4 Margaret
Fariss – David Sirak 52.78%
.69
3/4 Jan Gisholt
– Kenneth Cestone 52.78%
Saturday Afternoon Open Pairs
MPs A
B C Score
7.50 1 Fred
Donald, Jr. – Rudolph Polli 66.51%
5.63 2 Kelsey
Nickerson – Lloyd Arvedon 65.97%
4.22 3
4.55 4
1 1 Gavin Landry – James Morrison 61.57%
3.41 5
2 Paul Cohen – Andy Avery 61.38%
2.56 6
3 Arlene Duboff – Linda Tedeschi 60.26%
1.92 4 Judie Muggia – Reid Fleming
59.03%
1.44 5 Alden Edwards - Jean-Guy
Beliveau 56.09%
2.03 6 2 Sally
1.52 3
1.14 4 Louise
Landry – Harry Landry 53.85%
.86 5 Jean Drake – David Sirak
52.08%
.80 6 Edward Buttolph – Harold Smith 51.62%
Saturday Evening B/C/D Pairs
MPs B
C D Score
4.02 1 Beverly
Balch – Mary Anne Pickett 67.59%
3.02 2
1 Rose Gove – Edward
Gove 60.65%
2.26 3
2 1 Lawrence Rawls –
1.70 4 Jessie
Chikalla – Irene Fleming 57.87%
1.27 5
1.44 6
3 2 Barbara Parks –
1.08 4 3 James
Morrison – Gavin Landry 56.02%
.94 5 Carolyn
Combi – Bonnie Taylor 55.56%
.81 6
4 Sally
.71 5/6 Rhoda Chickering – Sandy Desilets 53.94%
.67 5/6 Ruth Connally – Gordon Johnson 53.94%
Saturday Evening Flight A Pairs
MPs Score
6.83 1 William
Fischner – Michael Rogers 60.50%
5.12 2 Lloyd
Arvedon – Kelsey Nickerson 59.38%
3.84 3 James
Chase –
2.88 4 Ellie
Hanlon – Mary Savko 55.82%
2.16 5 Judy
Dubay – Harry Kaufmann 55.66%
1.62 6 Michael
Farrell – Gerald DiVincenzo 53.92%
Sunday Swiss Teams
MPs A
B C Score
10.25 1 Lloyd
Arvedon – Kelsey Nickerson
Shome Mukherjee – William Hunter 108
7.69 2 Pierce
Smith – Stewart MacKeigan
Robert Donald – Diane Burger 104
5.77 3
1 Reid Fleming –
Rich Stevens
Albert Muggia – R. Muggia 103
4.32 4 Bob
Gorsey – Joyce Pearson
David Shaw – Jackie Kimel 102
3.24 5 Mary
Savko – Elie Hanlon
Paul
Cohen – Andy Avery 99
2.43 6 Frank
Hacker – Phil Sharpsteen
Rudolph Polli – Fred Donald Jr. 93
3.62 2 Jay Friedenson – Gary Feingold
3.09 3 1 Richard
Gazley – Martha Gazley
Sandy Desilets – Rhoda Chickering
83
2.32 4 2 C
Kirk Osterland – Elizabeth von Riesenfelder
Linda Baker – Judith Ward
82
1.74 5 3 Nancy Anderson – Denise Olson
Claire Gardner – Peachey Wojcik 78
1.30 4
Judy Dobert – Joan Dobert 64
Sunday 299er Swiss Teams
MPs Score
1.51 1 Sheila
Long – Karen Kristiansen
Sally Newton – John Newton 51
1.13 2 Margaret
Farriss – Susan Ransom
David Sirak – Raymond Lopes
46
As usual, Vermonters have done well at out of state tournaments. Congratulations to the following Vermonters for outstanding performances (over 20 points).
Courtney Nelson 47.46 Andy Avery 42.71
Gatlinburg Regional: Phil Sharpsteen 88.71 Frank Hacker 88.71
Patricia DiVincenzo 86.56 Kathleen Farrell 86.56
Wayne Hersey
Jay Friedenson 34.36 Ruth Stokes 32.90
David Shaw 30.60 Jean Tout 22.12
Doug Clark 22.12 Jon
Stokes 19.75
COMING ATTRACTIONS
July 14-16 Vermont Summer Sectional (see flyer at the end of this issue)
July 13-23 ACBL summer nationals – Hyatt Regency – Chicago
(Some
place to go AFTER the Vermont
Sectional)
August
5 Marilyn Hacker Memorial Pairs
–
August
13 Unit wide game – Woodstock
Country Club – 2 single session games with a turkey buffet – first session at
10:30 AM, second session at 3:00 PM The cost is $30 per person for both
sessions of bridge and dinner. The cost for each session of bridge is $7.50. To
reserve your spot, call Jesse Stalker (603)298-8913.
October
8 Vermont Bridge Association annual
meeting, combined with the 2 session, President’s Cup Pairs –
October 27-29
November
8-12 Ed
Gould Masters Regional – Sheraton Hotel,
This regional tournament is the first
open regional tournament held in VT in about 25 years. The
Cortina Inn and
Resort
July 14 to 16, 2006 Sanction # S0607034
Schedule of events:
Friday July 14th
2:00PM Open Pairs, Stratified
Newcomer Pairs,
Stratified
8:00PM Open Pairs, Stratified
Newcomer Pairs,
Stratified
Saturday July 15th
1:00PM Open Pairs, Stratified
Newcomer
7:00PM Open Pairs, Stratiflighted
A (separate
event) = 0 to 72000
B = 500 to 1500
C = 200 to 500
D = 0 to 200
Sunday July 16th
10:30AM 1st session
Open Swiss Teams, Stratified
0 to
300 Swiss Teams (1 session only)
@3:00PM
2nd session Open Swiss Teams, Stratified
Open Stratifications: A above
1500, B 500 to 1500, C 0 to 500
Newcomer Stratifications: A
100 to 300, B 50 to 100, C 0 to 50 (Strats may be adjusted)
Price per session: $8 - $1
additional for Non-ACBL members
Director (&MC): Dave
Marshall
Partnerships and information: Dave Shaw
(800) 639-8000 davida.shaw@agedwards.com
Hospitality:
The VBA is pleased to offer free refreshments after the Friday and
Saturday evening sessions and at 10:00AM before the Swiss Teams begin on Sunday
at 10:30.
Accommodations for the
tournament at the Cortina Inn
:
1
person 2 persons
Superior room $149 $149
Queen deluxe $159 $159
King deluxe $169 $169
Package includes 2 nights
stay with 2 breakfast buffets per person and a $10 per person food voucher
towards dinner in Zola’s Grille. 9%
Reservations: 1-800 451-6108
or 802-773-3331. email: cortina1@aol.com.
Fax: 802- 775-6948.
Table Talk
A publication of the Vermont Bridge Association
Frank A. Hacker, Editor
The
publishes Table Talk quarterly. If you are an ACBL and Unit
175 (
And have not received a copy of Table Talk, please notify the editor. Contributors’ articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the VBA.